Crying can be used as evidence against spouse, court rules

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Mug shot of Lesiba Simon Matsoake courtesy of WTKR

RALEIGH, N.C. (October 20, 2015) — When a husband or wife cries, can their tears be used as evidence against them?

Yes, the North Carolina Court of Appeals says in one case, ruling Tuesday that crying isn’t protected by confidential communication between spouses.

The case involves Lesiba Simon Matsoake, an alleged serial rapist. He appealed his 2014 conviction for a rape that occurred in June 2003.

His now ex-wife, Ruth Hart, testified that she first became suspicious of her husband when he started crying while looking at a composite sketch of the attacker, presumably a drawing that looked like him.

Matsoake appealed his conviction, but the appeals court said the spousal protection only covers spoken words – not crying

Matsoake is also accused of several sexual assaults in Virginia.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.