DOJ says Trump Hiring Kushner does not violate anti-nepotism law

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

President-elect Donald Trump embraces son in law Jared Kushner,(R), after his acceptance speech at the New York Hilton Midtown in the early morning hours of November 9, 2016 in New York City. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department concluded Friday that Jared Kushner serving in his father-in-law’s administration would not be a violation of federal anti-nepotism laws.

“In choosing his personal staff, the President enjoys an unusual degree of freedom, which Congress found suitable to the demands of his office,” wrote Daniel Koffsky, deputy assistant attorney general in the DOJ Office of Legal Counsel, which serves as interpreter of federal law for the White House. “Any appointment to that staff, however, carries with it a set of legal restrictions, by which Congress has regulated and fenced in the conduct of federal officials.”

A person familiar with the issue told CNN that Trump’s transition team asked career lawyers with the DOJ Office of Legal Counsel to review the proposed Kushner appointment.

Another source familiar with the matter said Koffsky is a longtime career attorney at OLC. The person familiar with the issue said political appointees of the DOJ, including Attorney General Loretta Lynch, did not play any role in the opinion.

A transition source told CNN earlier this month that Kushner, who is married to the President’s daughter Ivanka, will be senior adviser to the president.

Kushner, a 36-year-old Harvard-educated businessman, was a key political strategist on Trump’s election. But federal anti-nepotism laws brought into question whether he could continue his influence in the President’s life post-election.

Trump — along with many of his Cabinet nominees — has repeatedly been criticized for conflict of interest. But the Justice Department downplayed those concerns in this specific hire.

“A President wanting a relative’s advice on governmental matters therefore has a choice: to seek that advice on an unofficial, ad hoc basis without conferring the status and imposing the responsibilities that accompany formal White House positions; or to appoint his relative to the White House under title 3 and subject him to substantial restrictions against conflicts of interest,” Koffsky wrote.

The application of the ruling states that the President of the United States may be an exception to that rule.

“We believe that the President’s special hiring authority in 3 U.S.C. § 105(a) permits him to make appointments to the White House Office that the anti-nepotism statute might otherwise forbid,” Koffsky wrote.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s